Thursday, April 16, 2020

Sample Essays For Writing in MLA Th Edition

Sample Essays For Writing in MLA Th EditionIf you are serious about writing an effective essay, then you should consider taking a look at sample essays for writing in the MLA Th Edition. The online resource that can help you in this regard is the ThEdExaminer website.The ThEdExaminer website is one of the better resources that will give you all the information you need to write a well-written essay on MLA Th. All you have to do is get an account on the website and start writing. The website is divided into sections like Style, Structure, and Theme.You can begin writing your essay by clicking on the topic Essay Format. This topic is divided into chapters and sub-chapters. You can choose among the six essay styles: Open Ended, Case, Logical/Definite Statement, Narrow Statement, Related Field, and Inclusive Field.The second section on the website will give you tips on essay topics. The topic on 'Premise' is one of the most important aspects in any essay. The essay on 'Main Points' offer s help with defining the subject of the essay. And so is the topic on 'Critical Insights'.The topic on 'Essay Structure' is the topic on which you can get help with. In this section, you can find tips on the writing of paragraphs, double space, etc. You will also find it useful to know that in some topics, the content can be broken down into logical sections.The third section on the sample essay is 'Theme'. Here, you can learn how to avoid the use of the same word in different ways. You can also look up topics that can be used to create your theme and see how they can help you in writing an effective essay.The Last but not the least section of the sample essay that you can look up is 'Editing for MLA Th.' Here, you can get useful tips on how to make the best use of the MLA format. And when it comes to different types of editing, the site also offers help in this area.There are lots of online resources that can help you with writing an essay on MLA Th. So take a look at the sample es says that are available on the ThEdExaminer website and find out how you can take advantage of the free resources provided.

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Iv Therapy free essay sample

Intravenous therapy or IV therapy is when a patient is given liquid substances directly into a vein. The word intravenous means within a vein†. Therapies administered intravenously are often called specialty pharmaceuticals. IV therapy is commonly referred to as a drip because many of the ways it is administered use a drip chamber, which prevents air entering the blood stream and allows an idea of how much is flowing in to your body. Compared with other ways of administration the intravenous route is the fastest way to deliver fluids and medications throughout the body. Some medications, as well as blood transfusions and lethal injections, can only be given intravenously. The simplest form of IV therapy is given through a hypodermic needle. This kind of needle is hollow and allows for the drip to be administered directly to the vein. The needle can be directly attached to a syringe or even to tubing that may be attached to a drip of whatever medication is needed. We will write a custom essay sample on Iv Therapy or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The needle is usually put into a peripheral vein, this is any vein not in the chest or abdomen. Any easily accessible vein can be used but most commonly veins in the hand or arm are used. In infants it is common to use the veins in the scalp. Central IV lines flow through a catheter with its tip within a large vein, usually the superior vena cava, or inferior vena cava, or within the right atrium of the heart. This has several advantages over a peripheral IV. It can deliver fluids and medications that would be too irritating to peripheral veins because of their concentration or chemical composition. These include some chemotherapy drugs. Medications reach the heart immediately, and are quickly distributed to the rest of the body. However central IV’s run a higher risk of giving you an infection, causing bleeding, and possibly even causing gangrene. A common reason to be hooked up to an IV is for dehydration therapy. Those unable or unwilling to drink or who have repetitive vomiting can receive fluid replacement IV. You are hooked up to a drip and your fluids and electrolytes are replaced through the IV in your hand or arm. There are two types of fluids that are used for intravenous drips; crystalloids and colloids. Crystalloids are aqueous solutions of mineral salts or other water-soluble molecules. Colloids contain larger insoluble molecules, such as gelatin; blood itself is a colloid. The most commonly used crystalloid fluid is normal saline, a solution of sodium chloride at 0. 9% concentration, which is close to the concentration in the blood. Ringer’s lactate or Ringers acetate is another isotonic solution often used for large-volume fluid replacement. A solution of 5% dextrose in water, sometimes called D5W, is often used instead if the patient is at risk for having low blood sugar or high sodium. The choice of fluids may also depend on the chemical properties of the medications being given.

Thursday, April 2, 2020

Evolutionism And Creationism Essays - Pseudoscience, Creation Myths

Evolutionism And Creationism "The Creationist battle cry can be stated thus: Public ignorance is Creationist bliss." This is just one of the many attacks made against Creationist in Richard Young's article, "Why Creation ?Science' Must Be Kept Out of the Classroom." Throughout the article he uses many hasty generalizations about creationist theories. The first hasty generalizations Young makes are untrue statements about the Bible. He then uses states beliefs that are true for only of a few Christians with extremist ideas, not the common Christians view of Creationism. Young continues attacking Creationist by making more hasty generalizations, and begging the question on why Creationism is a weak argument compared to evolutionism. Finally, he tops all this off by attacking the Creationist theories in using false analogies. The first hasty generalization that Young makes is an attack on the Creationists' views. He claims that Creationists are extremists because they take the Bible literally. The reason why he has a problem with taking the Bible literally is because of his accusations of the Bible. He claims that the Bible says "that the earth is flat, that all space flight has been hoaxed, that the Sun orbits the stationary earth," and other statements of this nature. The problem with this accusation is that the Bible never makes any of these claims. Young then continues attacking Creationist by saying: It is precisely this loss of faith [not taking the Bible literally], alleged to have been caused by the proliferation of ?evolutionary thought,' that the creationist hold responsible for all the evils of the world, including ?sex education, alcohol, suicide, women's liberation, terrorism, homosexuality, inflation, socialism, racism and dirty books.' Judge Braswell Dean, a Georgia lobbyist for Creationism, lays an equally comprehensive spectrum of crimes on the doorstep of evolution: ...this monkey mythology of Darwin is the cause of abortions, permissiveness, promiscuity, perversions, pregnancies, prophylactics, pornotherapy[sic], pollution, poisoning and proliferation of crimes. These so-called "Creationists" may have made these statements, but it is obvious that they have misunderstood what the Bible says. The Bible states that sin originated from Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden and problems have existed ever since then. The problems in our society have nothing to do with the "monkey mythology" that the judge states. From these points of hasty generalizations, Young continues making more hasty generalizations and even begs the question of the validity of creationism as a science. First he says that Creationism does not offer any explanatory or predictive capabilities that the theory of evolution has. This is not true. In fact, Creationism has a great explanation for where the earth came from and how it will end up; the book of Genesis explains how God created it and the book of Revelations predicts how it will end up. After this statement, Young says that "What the Creationists present as a science are in fact pseudoscience[sic], much like palmistry, astrology and the alchemy of old. As a scientific alternative to evolution, Creationism is a dismal failure." Young does not give any reasons why; he leaves that question up to us to figure out. Creationism has no similarities to the things to which Young compares them. Creationism is not some cheesy science used to predict the future of somebody's life, and it is not some old science that has been proven wrong. As a matter of fact, Creationism has many valid arguments. For example, Ken Clark, writer of the Creation Outreach web-site, makes the point that billions of fish are found in the fossil record with scales, fins, intact. They were trapped suddenly and did not have time to rot or get eaten by scavengers. This does not happen normally. The great Genesis Flood of Noah and the Ark is a good explanation for these happenings and is one of many arguments for Creationism. Later on in Young's article he uses false analogies to argue against Creationists problems with evolutionary theory. He questions the Creationist understanding of the word ?theory' and then compares the evolutionist theory to that of the theory of music and Newton's laws. Young says that the only difference between the evolutionist theory and Newton's laws are that in Newton's time it was more fashionable to call theories laws. This use of comparing theories is illogical; there is a huge difference between the theory of music, Newton's laws, and theory of evolution. The theory of music is a term for the study of musical concepts and is accepted because it can be proved, same with Newton's laws. Newton's laws are not called laws just because that was more